Showing posts with label Forbes Billionaires List. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Forbes Billionaires List. Show all posts
Friday
Fil-Am brains of Snapchat among young US billionaires
SAN FRANCISCO—The brains of Snapchat, whose mother is a Filipino, is the latest addition to the list of US billionaires.
The mobile application Snapchat became a social media star with messages that vanish after viewing, making cofounders Robert “Bobby” Murphy, a Filipino-American, and Evan Spiegel among the youngest billionaires on the planet.
Forbes now estimates Murphy and Spiegel to be worth about $4 billion each.
If Spiegel is the public face of the company, which is about to debut as a public company, Murphy may well be considered its brains.
The company was recently rebranded just Snap in an effort to be seen as being about more than one hit smartphone application.
Murphy, Snap’s technical director, is 28 years old and he is credited for the software that made Snapchat a hit.
Few details have surfaced about Murphy, a Stanford mathematics and computational science graduate.
His parents were local government workers in the city of Berkeley across the bay from San Francisco, according to a Forbes story.
Murphy’s mother, Rosie L. Go, migrated from the Philippines to the United States where she married Cornelius M. Murphy Jr.
Bobby Murphy met Spiegel in 2010 at the Kappa Sigma frat house of Stanford University. In an interview with Forbes, Murphy said that he and Spiegel were not “cool” so they “tried to build things to be cool.”
The history of the company fits into Silicon Valley lore with wealth for its creators as well as controversy regarding who gets credit for its genesis.
LA-based startup
The startup, however, is based hundreds of kilometers from Silicon Valley in the Los Angeles beach town of Venice, known for surfers, body builders, bathing-suit clad roller skaters and sun-seeking tourists.
The image of Spiegel, Snap’s 26-year-old cofounder and chief, is far from that of a geek.
Media dives into Spiegel’s life paint a picture of a privileged childhood in the posh Pacific Palisades community of Southern California, a penchant for parties, and a celebrity fiancee, model Miranda Kerr.
Details from divorce documents filed by his parents, lawyers educated at prestigious US universities, included a then 17-year-old Spiegel arguing a need for an allowance of about $2,000 monthly to support his accustomed lifestyle.
He played his parents against one another to get a new BMW car, according to court paperwork.
At a conference at Stanford University in 2013, Spiegel acknowledge growing up with advantages.
“I am a young, white, educated male,” Spiegel said. “Life isn’t fair …. It’s not about working hard. It’s about working the system.”
He told of family connections making it possible for him to attend Stanford classes with Silicon Valley stars and to get a job at software company Intuit.
His eclectic array of professional experiences includes an internship at energy drink company Red Bull, lab work in biomedical computing and teaching in South Africa.
He wound up majoring in product design, but dropped out shortly before graduation time to devote himself to a nascent Snapchat startup.
Genesis
The official version of Snap’s genesis is that Spiegel and Murphy were Stanford students who became friends in a fraternity and then invented Snapchat.
“We just thought it might be cool to make photos disappear,” Spiegel said at the Stanford conference in 2013.
However, a third fraternity brother, Reggie Brown, filed a lawsuit claiming that he was ousted from the startup after coming up with the idea the ghost-shaped logo and the original “Picaboo” name for the application.
Resolution of that case was not made public, but an apparent reference was noted in regulatory filings for Snap’s initial public offering (IPO) of shares.
Snap paid $157.4 million in 2014 to an unidentified “individual” to settle a legal dispute over intellectual property issues, the filing said.
Facebook offer
That payout came the year after Spiegel and Murphy rejected a $3-billion offer from leading social network Facebook to buy Snapchat.
Following a Silicon Valley trend, going public will not reduce the two cofounders’ control over the company. Shares being sold to investors give ownership stakes but no voting rights.
“Picaboo” messaging application launched in 2011, was quickly renamed Snapchat and caught fire with teens who could embrace spontaneity without worrying images or messages would linger to haunt them.
A side effect was that it became seen as a “sexting” app.
161M daily users
By the end of last year, Snap boasted some 161 million people were using it daily.
In what could well be a first for an IPO regulatory filing, Snap refers to “sexting,” but only to stress that its smartphone application is for “much more” than sending risque pictures that vanish after being viewed.
Snap has announced it intends to “reinvent the camera” and has been expanding availability of its second product Spectacles sunglasses with built in cameras that sync to the smartphone application.
The company contends it can generate healthy and sustainable revenue with advertising aimed at its users, the bulk of whom are in a coveted demographic of people 18 to 34 years old. —AFP
source: technology.inquirer.net
Monday
Richest 1 percent will own more than the rest by 2016 – Oxfam
LONDON - More than half the world's wealth will be owned by just one percent of the population by next year as global inequality soars, anti-poverty charity Oxfam said on Monday.
In a report released ahead of this week's annual meeting of the international elite at Davos in Switzerland, Oxfam said the top tier had seen their share of wealth increase from 44 percent in 2009 to 48 percent in 2014.
On current trends, it will exceed 50 percent in 2016.
The charity's executive director, Winnie Byanyima, who is co-chairing the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, said an explosion in inequality was holding back the fight against poverty.
"Do we really want to live in a world where the one percent own more than the rest of us combined?" she said on Monday.
"Business as usual for the elite isn't a cost free option. Failure to tackle inequality will set the fight against poverty back decades. The poor are hurt twice by rising inequality—they get a smaller share of the economic pie and because extreme inequality hurts growth, there is less pie to be shared around."
Oxfam said it would call for action to tackle rising inequality at the Davos meeting, which starts on Wednesday, including a crackdown on tax dodging by corporations and progress towards a global deal on climate change.
The richest 80 individuals in the world had the same wealth as the poorest 50 percent of the entire population, some 3.5 billion people, Oxfam said. This was an even bigger concentration at the top than a year ago, when half the world's wealth was in the hands of 85 of the ultra rich.
Members of the top 1 percent had an average wealth of $2.7 million per adult, Oxfam said.
The bulk of the world's remaining wealth was owned by the rest of the richest fifth, while the other 80 percent shared just 5.5 percent of the pot, equalling an average wealth of $3,851 per adult, it said.
Oxfam used data from the Credit Suisse Global Wealth Datebook, 2013 and 2014, and the Forbes' billionaires list to compile its research. — Reuters
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


